|
The
Press Council of India has held that government
accommodation,
concessional land, free air tickets and company
shares being given to
journalists, news agencies and newspaper establishments
and owners, are 'undue favours'.
The
Council, which undertook a comprehensive study
of the subject between 1985 and 1995, concluded
that free and concessional bus, rail and other
transport facilities given to journalists also
fell in the category of favours. It observed that
free air travel provided by companies, corporations
and airlines was an inducement to write favourably
about their products and services, and hence,
marred independent reporting.
The
Council noted that proprietors of newspapers,
instead of journalists and editors, were accompanying
the president, vice president, prime minister
and the external affairs ministry officials, on
their foreign trips. Newspapers, it recommended,
should take care to nominate eligible persons
for such trips.
The
Commission also observed that indiscriminate disbursement
of money from the discretionary funds of the chief
ministers encouraged unfaithfulness to the mission
of journalism and promoted corrupt practices.
The following are the recommendations:
Recommendations
The Committee (of the Council on undue favours
to journalists) came to the
conclusion that the following facilities so far
being extended by the
government and the authorities, companies and
corporations would amount to favours subject to
the observations made here under:
1. Accomodation: Government housing/flats/land
The Committee is of the view that it is the responsibility
of the newspaper
establishments to provide accommodation to its
employees. The Committee
noted that the Punjab and Haryana High Court in
its judgement has held that
journalists are not entitled to government accommodation
as they are not
employees of the government. The Court has said
that there were no rules,
regulations or guidelines governing such allotment
with the Chandigarh
administration. The Court observed that the existing
rules were only meant
for government servants and there was no question
of bringing journalists in its ambit. The Committee
further noted that the Central Government in its
action taken report on the suggestions of the
Second Press Commission to the effect that: no
further housing facility should be provided to
the journalists and the existing allotments of
the government accommodation in the National Capital
and the States should be charged for at non-subsidised
rates and phased out as the present occupants
leave had recorded that no further housing
facility would be provided to journalists and
in respect of the existing allotments, rent would
be charged at non subsidised rates. This decision
was taken nearly a decade ago. However, the allotments
continued.
The
Committee also noted that the governments were
giving prime land to the
newspaper owners at nominal price. Some of the
newspaper establishments had either rented out
the entire premises after retaining a small portion
for
their own use or had converted the premises into
a commercial complex
thereby earning huge profits. In some of the cases,
it was found that the
newspapers with a view to get another allotment
at some other place after
renting out the entire building, were not even
reporting on attacks on their own scribes for
the simple reason that they wanted to remain in
the good books of the government. Such newspapers
were compromising with the fascist forces and
the freedom of the press.
2.
Allotment of shares in companies
The Committee was of the opinion that if shares
were allotted at special prices or were given
under any quota, this would amount to favour.
The
Press Council of India has already issued guidelines
for the financial
journalists.
3.
Bus travel/rail travel/transport
The Committee was of the opinion that this was
a favour so for as big and
medium newspapers are concerned. The journalists
attached to newspapers
which are in profit have no justification for
availing free or concessional bus/rail/air transport
facility. However, in case of small newspapers
this
constituted a facility as the Committee felt that
there was justification for extending such a facility.
The media persons working at the grassroot level,
and work for small newspapers are paid the bare
minimum recommended
under the Wage Board Awards. The financial condition
of most of the small
newspapers is precarious and without such a facility
they would be unable
to cover all news which is necessary to be communicated
to their readers.
Most of the news of the local level which appears
in these newspapers were
most times picked up by the medium and big newspapers.
The reporters of the small newspapers and accredited
freelance journalists, who cannot afford
it, must have the facility to travel as much as
possible.
4.
Foreign Travel
The companies, corporations and airlines extend
the facility of air travel to journalists not
only within the country but also abroad. The journalists
avail of this happily. This is an inducement to
write favourably about their products/airlines.
A propaganda is undertaken through such devices
to
commercially promote the products/airlines. This
certainly interferes with
independent reporting.
Before 1986, the president, vice president, prime
minister and external affairs minister were accompanied
by journalists during their foreign trips on the
basis of pick and choose policy. But in 1987,
Press Council of India framed guidelines on selection
of journalists on PM's entourage and this was
being generally followed. The Committee, however,
noted that often the proprietors of the newspapers
were accompanying the president/prime minister
on foreign tours in place of journalists and editors.The
Committee recommended that the newspapers should
take care to nominate eligible persons for the
purpose.

5.
Free air tickets
The Committee was of the opinion that this practice
constituted an undue
favour as it enticed journalists to write favourable
reports to commercially promote the airline.
6.
Cash disbursement from CM'S discretionary fund
The Committee noted that there are guidelines
as to how the discretionary
fund at the disposal of the chief minister or
any other functionary has to be
spent. The guidelines should be followed strictly.
Indiscriminate disbursement of money from the
discretionary fund of the chief ministers encourages
unfaithfulness to the mission of journalism and
promotes corrupt practices.
7.
Financial assistance
The Committee was of the opinion that if financial
assistance is given for
medical treatment purposes, it still constitutes
a favour, unless, medical aid is being given under
the clear cut policy uniformly applicable to all
those destitutes or sick persons who cannot afford
the medical treatment in case the journalist incidentally
happens to be one of those persons, there is nothing
wrong in it.
In Delhi, all the journalists accredited to PIB
are entitled to CGHS facility. The Committee feels
that extending the CGHS facility to journalists
is illogical since CGHS facility is available
to government servants only. The provision of
medical facilities to its employees is the responsibility
of the newspaper establishments.
8-9.
Funds for media centre and grants to journalists
associations
The Committee was of the opinion that this
was a favour, unless it was given for promoting
the journalistic skills.
10.
Gift cheque by advertising agencies for publication
of press note of their clients
The Committee was of the opinion that this
was a favour and deserved outright condemnation.
11.
Other gifts
The Committee was of the opinion that gifts in
any form, irrespective of their value, are to
be condemned.
12.
Free parking
The Committee was of the opinion that this was
a favour if a journalist uses this facility for
purposes other than his professional work.
13.
Guest hospitality
The Committee was of the opinion that working
journalists as a rule should
not be treated as State guests. In case an individual
is treated as a State
guest he ipso facto becomes entitled to many facilities
without any payment
thereof. However, when press teams are invited
in discharge of their
professional duties, making due arrangements for
them should be an
exception. The committee further noted that the
stay in government guest
houses by accredited journalists, is permissible
if it is for discharging
professional duties.
14.
Import of duty free cameras and computers
The Committee was of the opinion it is the duty
of the newspaper establishment to, provide cameras/computers
to its personnel. An individual
employee journalist is not required to buy camera/computer
for his work. In
the recent past, the Central government had allowed
import of duty free
cameras and computers to the journalists. The
Committee felt that this
concession amounted to a favour. However, the
Committee was of the opinion that this facility
should be permissible for accredited freelance
journalists, provided it is not misused.
15.
Insurance premium
The Committee was of the opinion that it is not
for the government to pay
for the premium towards the insurance of journalists.
It is the duty of the
newspaper establishments or the individual concerned
to make such payment
towards annual dues once the scheme has been introduced.
16.
Job to relatives
Giving jobs to journalist's relative/s not on
merit, is an outright attempt
at inducement.
17.
Loans
The Committee was of the opinion that the grant
of loans within the ambit
of policy already laid down for all citizens is
permissible. But when the loan is given only to
the journalists or at reduced rate of interest
or when the interest due or the principal amount
is waived/written off/condoned, such a practice
would amount to undue favour.
18.
Nomination on committees
The Committee was of the opinion that in some
states, the journalists are
nominated on some organisations and institutions
like Public Service
Commission and are also given the status of state
minister or Cabinet
Minister, which was a wrong practice. Except for
the nomination by the
professional organisations on committees which
have a quota to represent
the various professionals, this practice constitutes
favour.
19.
PCO/FAX/Phone booth or centre
The Committee was of the opinion that this is
obviously a favour, if gifted. The fax and the
phone facility given to all journalists is, however,
to be distinguished from the allotment of such
booths.
20.
Pensionary benefits
The
Committee was of the opinion that since the Fourth
Estate was not a
part of the government, this benefit constituted
a favour if the pensionary
benefits were extended by the government. The
role of the authorities should be limited to ensuring
that the newspaper establishments implement the
awards of the Wage Boards.
21.
Press clubs - donation of funds
The Committee noted that this practice is prevalent
all over the country and fund are being donated
lavishly by chief ministers/ministers/leaders
not only to genuine press clubs but also to the
press clubs of dubious nature. It, therefore,
constituted an attempt to induce the journalists
to give favourable reports about the donors.
22.
Prizes
The Committee felt that the practice of giving
spurious awards has to be
curbed. There were instances, not worth mentioning,
of sale of awards and
prizes by racketeers making money out of it. Not
only the racketeers but
awardees also were often contributing towards
the value of the prizes.
23.
Shops
Allotment of shops in their capacity as journalists
is a clear cut favour.

Facilities
The Committee was of the opinion that the following
constituted facilities,
subject to the remarks given:
1.
Accreditation
The pattern of the formation of the Central Press
Accreditation Committee
should be followed in all states and union territories.
The CPAC at present
has a good composition of representatives of journalists,
owners, editors
and non editors' organisations headed by Principal
Information Officer of the Press Information Bureau,
Government of India. Another officer, Director
of External Publicity is also called to attend
the meeting whenever the issue of foreign accreditation
is considered. However, it be made mandatory that
the accreditation committee should be constituted
within a month of the expiry of the term of the
earlier committee and committee should hold its
meetings quarterly. A provisional accreditation,
if given, must come up before the accreditation
committee in its first meeting thereafter.
2. Government and public authority advertisements
It is a mutually beneficial transaction when conducted
in keeping with the
parameters defined in an already laid down policy.
However, when given to
individual newspapers on ad hoc basis or for extraneous
considerations or
when they are not routed through centralised agency,
they constitute
favour.
In addition, governments and public authorities,
including the railways, must publish in their
annual reports etc., the information regarding
advertisements and facilities given by them to
journalists and their organisations etc., to ensure
greater transparency in their working.
3.
Election facilities
The Committee was of the opinion that this was
a must, so that journalists
are able to cover the events relating to the most
important electoral process. Access to all the
places of information must be given to them, subject
to reasonable restrictions imposed by the Election
Commission of India.
4.
Meeting expenses for journalistic conventions,
seminars, etc.
The Committee was of the opinion that this was
permissible so long as under
its garb, cash grants are not given by the governments
and public authorities and others.
5.
Press rooms
They are a facility required to be provided for
due discharge of the professional duties by the
journalists.
6.
Inviting press parties
The Committee was of the opinion that as stated
earlier, this was a facility extended by the authorities
to provide the necessary information on matters
of public interest to the public.
7.
Publication material during press conference
The Committee was of the opinion that this was
a facility.
8.
Training
The Committee was of the opinion that this was
a facility and should be
encouraged as this will improve the knowledge
and efficiency of all those
engaged in the profession of journalism. The Press
Council of India further stated:
The State governments/UTs which have not provided
complete information on
further queries of the Council are Andhra Pradesh,
Chandigarh Administration, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala,
Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab and
Uttar Pradesh. ________________________________________________________________
The Council's Committee on undue favours
to journalists (hereinafter referred to as Committee)
also sought public co-operation by issuing press
releases, from time to time in all the States
and Union Territories, inviting organisations,
institutions and members of the public to provide
any such information to the Committee as may be
in their possession or knowledge, which was relevant
to the issue.
The information received from various sources
reveals that the press
persons/newspaper establishments are enjoying
the following amenities:
1. Accommodation Government Housing/Flats/Land
2. Allotment of Shares in Companies.
3. Bus Travel/Rail Travel/Transport
4. Foreign Travel
5. Free Air Tickets
6. Cash Disbursement from Chief Ministers Discretionary
Fund
7. Financial Assistance
8. Funds for Media Centre and the like
9. Grants to journalists associations
10. Gift Cheque by advertisement agencies for
publication of press notes of
their clients.
11. Other gifts
12. Free Parking
13. Guest Hospitality
14. Import of duty free cameras and computers
15. Insurance Premium
16. Jobs to relatives
17. Loans
18. Nomination on Committees
19. PCO/Fax/Phone
20. Pensionary benefits
21. Donation of funds to Press Clubs
22. Prizes
23. Shops
24. Accreditation
25. Government and public authority advertisements
26. Election facilities
27. Meeting expenses for journalists' conventions,
seminars, etc.
28. Inviting press parties
29. Publication material (issued) during press
conferences
30. Training (Based on a circular by AINEF)
Address
of the Press Council:
Press Council of India
Faridcot House (Ground Floor)
Copper Nicus Marg
New Delhi, India.
To
Bare acts
To
Commentary

|